Visa Study Says Bank-Style Protections Could Push Stablecoin Use Sharply Higher
TL;DR Visa says U.S. willingness to use stablecoins rises from 36% to 56% when hypothetical bank-level fraud protection and deposit insurance are added. The study covered 2,192 U.S. adults and more than 45,000 respondents across 20 markets. The findings suggest trust and consumer protection may be a bigger barrier to mainstream stablecoin use than the underlying technology. Stablecoins have spent years getting faster, cheaper and easier to move. Visa’s latest research suggests the next adoption problem may be much less technical. It is trust. Visa’s Money Travels 2026 study found that 36% of U.S. respondents would consider using stablecoins under the base scenario. That rises to 45% when the product is offered through an existing financial provider, then jumps to 56% when hypothetical bank-level fraud protection and deposit insurance are added. The Biggest Adoption Lever May Be Familiar Protection That is a useful result because stablecoin products are often marketed around settlement speed and cost. Consumers appear to care just as much about what happens when something goes wrong. Visa found that many users are willing to accept slower transfers in exchange for stronger safeguards. In the U.S., 45% of respondents said they would accept a 24-hour delay if it came with better fraud protection. The study also found that 36% of Americans surveyed had encountered cross-border payment scams, while 44% were concerned about AI-enabled fraud such as deepfakes. Those numbers help explain why a stablecoin can be technically superior to an older payment rail and still struggle to win over a mainstream customer. Deposit Insurance Remains Hypothetical Here There is an important caveat. Visa’s survey presented bank-style fraud protection and deposit insurance as hypothetical features. Stablecoins are not automatically covered by protections such as FDIC insurance simply because they track the dollar.
Key Takeaways
- willingness to use stablecoins rises from 36% to 56% when hypothetical bank-level fraud protection and deposit insurance are added.
- The study covered 2,192 U.S.
- adults and more than 45,000 respondents across 20 markets.
Summary generated by IndiCrypto from NewsBTC. IndiCrypto is a news aggregator and does not provide investment advice. Read the original article for full context.
More in Regulation
Tether's Offshore Bank Just Froze its Funds: Is There a Risk for USDT?
Tether's offshore banking partner just froze its funds after a US seizure, raising new questions about risk to USDT. The post Tether's Offshore Bank Just Froze its Funds: Is There a Risk for USDT? appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Galaxy Adds $100M Of Sky’s sUSDS To Corporate Treasury
TL;DR Galaxy has added $100 million of Sky Protocol’s sUSDS to its own corporate treasury. The firm has also approved sUSDS as collateral across an institutional trading business carrying an average loan book of about $1.4 billion. Galaxy additionally bought…
Blockchain.com And NYSE Plan 24/7 Tokenized Stock Access
TL;DR Blockchain.com and NYSE Group have signed an agreement to explore access to tokenized U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs. The proposed service would use NYSE’s planned digital trading venue and could support around-the-clock trading for eligible global users.…